6  Lab versus field

A common claim against laboratory experiments is that they do not enable conclusions to be drawn about the “real world” Those critiques tend to rest on three foundations:

These three critiques mean that lab experiments can have limited relevance for predicting field behaviour unless the aspects of behaviour being studied are general across environments, stakes and subject pools.

Field experiment, by contrast:

Lab experiments are not, however, without their advantages:

The result of this balance of costs and benefits means that lab and field experiments should be seen as being methodologically complementary. Each can enable insights that the other can’t. Experiments in one can be used to inform the other.

We will return to the question of lab versus field experiments in more detail later when we explore the generalisability of experiments.